In-Game Graphics Settings Explained: What to Turn Down First
Not all graphics settings cost the same performance for the visual benefit they provide. Here is a practical order for adjusting settings when you need more frame rate.
Not all graphics settings cost the same performance for the visual benefit they provide. Here is a practical order for adjusting settings when you need more frame rate.

Photo by domdomegg / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 4.0
When a game runs poorly, the instinct is often to drop every setting to its lowest value at once. That works, but it also throws away visual quality you didn’t need to sacrifice. A more efficient approach is understanding which settings tend to cost the most performance relative to how noticeable they are during actual gameplay, and adjusting those first, one at a time, rather than lowering everything uniformly.
Why Settings Aren’t Equally “Expensive”
Every graphics setting trades rendering cost for visual fidelity, but that trade-off isn’t consistent across settings. Some options — like certain shadow or reflection techniques — can be very demanding on the GPU while producing a difference that’s easy to miss during fast-paced gameplay, since you’re rarely staring directly at a shadow’s edge mid-match. Others, like texture resolution, are often comparatively cheap to run at a high setting as long as your GPU has enough memory, because the performance cost scales differently than the visual impact. Knowing this distinction lets you preserve the settings that actually improve how the game looks to you while cutting the ones that mostly show up in still screenshots.
A Practical Order for Turning Settings Down
When you need better performance, consider adjusting settings roughly in this order, testing after each change rather than changing several at once:
- Shadow quality and shadow distance — often expensive, and the difference is subtle during active gameplay.
- Ambient occlusion — adds subtle shading detail that’s rarely noticeable while moving or in combat.
- Reflections — particularly screen-space or ray-traced reflection settings, which can be costly relative to their visibility in most scenes.
- Post-processing effects like motion blur or depth of field — these are often stylistic rather than clarity-improving, and many competitive players disable them regardless of performance, since they can reduce visual clarity.
- Anti-aliasing method — try a lighter method before disabling entirely, since jagged edges can be distracting even if the setting isn’t expensive.
- Resolution or resolution scaling — treat this as a later step, since it affects overall image sharpness more directly than the settings above.
Testing one change at a time, in a demanding part of the game rather than a menu or loading screen, gives you an accurate sense of what each setting is actually costing you.
Settings Worth Keeping High When Possible
Texture quality is usually worth keeping as high as your GPU’s memory comfortably allows, since low-resolution textures are immediately visible and rarely worth the modest performance savings. Draw distance and object detail settings are also worth being cautious about lowering too aggressively in competitive games specifically, since reduced draw distance can mean spotting opponents or important objects later than players running higher settings — a real gameplay disadvantage, not just a visual one.
Use In-Game Benchmarks and Overlays if Available
Many games include a built-in benchmark mode or an on-screen performance overlay showing frame rate and sometimes GPU or CPU load. These tools make it far easier to see the actual effect of a settings change rather than guessing based on how a session felt. If a game offers one, running a quick benchmark before and after a settings change takes little time and removes a lot of the guesswork from the tuning process.
Building Your Own Settings Profile
There’s no universal “correct” settings combination — it depends on your hardware, your monitor’s refresh rate, and how sensitive you personally are to different visual effects. The value of understanding the relative cost of each setting is that it lets you build a profile suited to your own priorities, rather than blindly following someone else’s exact configuration or dropping every setting uniformly the first time performance feels off.